Culture / Music and Culture
David Bowie and the Permission to Change
The music, clothes and curiosity of an artist who refused to remain in one place.
There are artists who give you a song for a particular moment, and others who give you permission to imagine an entirely different version of yourself. David Bowie was rather good at both.
He could look like someone who had arrived from another planet and, at the same time, sound deeply interested in the very human difficulty of finding a place to belong. The clothes, the characters and the theatricality were impossible to ignore. But beneath them was a willingness to ask what might happen if a person refused to stay exactly as everyone expected.
A wardrobe of possibilities
Bowie's career moved through strikingly different sounds and appearances. Ziggy Stardust made a character into a kind of event; Hunky Dory offered songs including “Changes” and “Life on Mars?”; later work moved through soul, electronic music, dance and other directions. The changes were not all equally comfortable, and they were not simply a series of outfits waiting to be admired.
Clothes gave the ideas a visible form. A silhouette, a flash of colour or an unexpected gesture could make the familiar suddenly seem open to question. For someone who felt out of place, that possibility mattered. The message was not necessarily that everyone should wear the same extraordinary thing. It was that there might be more than one way to be yourself.
The person behind the transformation
It is tempting to describe Bowie as a person who could become anyone. Perhaps the more interesting thought is that he kept following his curiosity, even when the result did not resemble what had come before. Reinvention can become an exhausting word when treated as an obligation. With Bowie, it can feel more like an invitation to keep looking.
Listen to “Life on Mars?” when you want grandeur and a little mystery; “Modern Love” when the day needs movement; “Heroes” when you want to hear determination in a voice that does not pretend the world is easy. Familiar songs are familiar for a reason. There is no additional virtue in starting with the most obscure track you can find.
A little room to be different
Bowie's influence reaches beyond a particular haircut or a jacket that would be difficult to explain at an ordinary family lunch. He expanded the sense of what popular music could look and sound like, and what an artist might be allowed to try.
There is something generous in that example. You can admire a version of yourself, grow out of it and try another. You can dress quietly one day and extravagantly the next. The point is not to perform difference for its own sake. It is to leave enough room for curiosity, and for the possibility that the person you are becoming may surprise even you.
The loneliness inside the spectacle
The spectacle could be dazzling, but Bowie was not interesting only when the light caught the costume. There is also vulnerability in the uncertainty of a song like “Space Oddity,” in the distance between the person imagined by the audience and the person inside the story. The strange setting does not make the feeling remote. It can make it easier to recognise.
His changing work also depended on other artists. Musicians, producers, designers and collaborators helped bring different sounds and images into being. Reinvention was not a solitary magic trick. It could be a conversation, an encounter or an invitation to look beyond what had worked before.
A place to begin
You might start with the theatrical world of The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars, then move to the rhythm and different atmosphere of Young Americans. Later records offer still more paths. There is no need to complete them in order, and no obligation to enjoy every turn equally.
The most reassuring thing may be that the records do not demand a fixed identity from their listener either. One afternoon calls for a familiar chorus; another may make room for something stranger. Both are ways in.
A voice that made the strange human
Bowie was not, for every listener, the most naturally beautiful or technically spectacular vocalist in popular music. His voice could sound theatrical, raw or deliberately strange, and some performances are less immediately appealing than others. That is a matter of taste rather than a defect that can be measured once and settled forever. What is harder to dispute is how effectively he used the voice he had: changing its character, inhabiting a song and giving an unfamiliar idea a human vulnerability.
The clothes were part of that same creative language. Ziggy's vivid hair, makeup and theatrical costumes made an image of possibility that could travel farther than an explanation. Later, a tailored suit might offer an entirely different sort of performance. Neither look needs to be copied to appreciate the lesson: style can be a way of asking a question rather than providing a final answer.
His restless changes also meant that a listener who loved one Bowie might not immediately welcome the next. Taking chances can produce uneven work as well as extraordinary discoveries. His influence did not depend on being perfect at everything. It came from the courage and imagination to make something distinctive, then to keep moving.